Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Stoneman and Drollinger

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2008No. DA 07-0174PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Mark J. Stoneman appeals from the order of the District Court for the Eighteenth Judicial District, Gallatin County, setting the reasonable rental value of property co-owned by the parties in Bozeman, Montana, at $1,200 per month. Ruth L. Drollinger cross-appeals from the order of the District Court denying her motion that sought forfeiture of Stoneman’s interest in the property, as well as from a separate order of the court determining that Washington State had jurisdiction over child support. We affirm in part and dismiss in part.

¶2 The issues on appeal and cross-appeal are as follows:

¶3…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kauffman-Harmon v. KauffmanMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Marriage of Stoneman v. DrollingerMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Stoneman v. DrollingerMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Yellowstone County v. WightMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Burchett v. MasTec North America, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Simpson v. SimpsonMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In RE THE MARRIAGE OF hOWARDMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Simpson v. SimpsonMontana Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API