Ober v. . Katzenstein
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by plaintiff from Cline, J., at February Term, 1911, of WARREN. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Chief Justice Ciarle.
1Opinion of the Court
The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE CLARK. DEFENDANT'S APPEAL. This action was brought to recover a balance due for the purchase of fertilizers. Revisal, 1149, requires every foreign corporation (excepting railroad, banking, insurance, express, and telegraph companies), before being permitted to do business in this State, to domesticate by filing in the office of the Secretary of State a copy of its charter and complying with certain regulations, and imposes a penalty of $500 for failure to observe the terms of that section. The plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blackwell's Durham Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Spencer v. . HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Herring v. Armwood.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Armour Fertilizer Works v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Carson v. BuntingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Courtney v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Tomlinson & Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Jones v. Union Guano Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Carter v. . McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.