Legal Opinion
Lucy v. Oram
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 12, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
Prom the finding of the court, it appears: In September, 1922, Harry A. Titus and Louisa Bishop purchased a tract of unimproved land, nearly rec tangular in shape, in the town of Waterford on the east side of the Niantic River, and lying between the Niantic River Road and the river. On its westerly side, the upland terminated in a steep bank ten or twelve feet above the shore. From this side, there was a clear, unobstructed view to the south and southwest, across the waters of Niantic Bay and Long Island Sound. By reason of its location, the land was desirable for the purpose of a seashore…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Easterbrook v. Hebrew Ladies Orphan SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Whitton v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Merino v. George F. Fish, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Fisk v. LeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Fox v. Hartford & West Hartford Horse RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lake Garda Company v. D'ArcheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Peterson v. RamckeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Fiondella v. City of MeridenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Denny v. TomeiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Jewett City Trust Company v. Marino, No. 527301 (Dec. 5, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995