Legal Opinion

Huber v. Steel

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 16, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The Constitution of this State, in Section 8, Article I thereof, provides inter alla as follows:

“ * * * Nor shall any man's property be taken or applied to public use without the consent of his representatives, and without compensation being made.”

In construing exactly similar language in the Constitution of 1831, the Court of Errors and Appeals of this State held in Whiteman's Ex’r. v. W. & S. R. R. Co., 2 Har. 514, 33 Am. Dec. 411, that the term “compensation” did not necessarily mean the intrinsic *305value of the property taken. This was for the reason that, if the act of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Department v. MorrisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. State v. BotluckSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API