Legal Opinion

Penland v. Agnich

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided February 11, 1997No. 05-95-01427-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KINKEADE, Justice.

This is a will construction case. Appellants contend the trial court erred in granting a partial summary judgment that declared the term “lawful issue,” as used in a will executed in 1945, included appellees, who are adopted. Because we conclude the trial court properly construed the will, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On August 10, 1945, J.M. Penland (Pen-land) executed a will. The will included specific bequests to his wife and his “beloved nephew (by marriage),” as well as a modest gift to two employees. The will disposed of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sharp v. Broadway National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Perfect Union Lodge No. 10 v. Interfirst Bank of San Antonio, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Cutrer v. CutrerTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Ortega v. First RepublicBank Fort Worth, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Gee v. ReadTexas Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Garza v. Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  2. Parker v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Jarvis v. Feild, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  4. Watson v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  5. Coleman v. Coleman, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API