Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. Farm Bureau Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 2010No. Docket No. 289467PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAAD, EJ.

Defendant Farm Bureau Insurance appeals the trial court’s order that denied its motion for summary disposition. We reverse.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On December 16, 2005, the Office of Financial and *312Insurance Services1 (OFIS) issued a “Notice and Order of Prohibition Pursuant to MCL 500.2236(5),” Order No. 05-060-M (Order No. 05-060-M).2 Order No. 05-060-M was signed by Chief Deputy Insurance Commissioner Frances K. Wallace. Order No. 05-060-M disapproved no-fault automobile insurance forms that provided a contractual limitations period of less than three years for claims for uninsured…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Odom v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Kreiner v. FischerMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. McDonald v. Farm Bureau InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Liparoto Construction, Inc v. General Shale Brick, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Michigan Assigned Claims FacilityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Adam v. BellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Ile v. Foremost InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API