State v. Spruill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Justice.
Guilt Phase
The defendant first assigns error to the testimony of the witnesses Lockart and Britton which showed there had been prior altercations between the defendant and Beatrice Williams. He argues that this testimony was only relevant to prove his character in order to show he acted in conformity therewith in killing Beatrice Williams. N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 404(b) prohibits evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts to prove the character of a person in order to show he acted in conformity therewith. If evidence of the other acts tends to prove any other relevant fact such…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- McDonald v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. BondurantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. SyrianiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. BaconSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.