Legal Opinion

State v. Spruill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1987No. 280A85PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

Guilt Phase

The defendant first assigns error to the testimony of the witnesses Lockart and Britton which showed there had been prior altercations between the defendant and Beatrice Williams. He argues that this testimony was only relevant to prove his character in order to show he acted in conformity therewith in killing Beatrice Williams. N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 404(b) prohibits evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts to prove the character of a person in order to show he acted in conformity therewith. If evidence of the other acts tends to prove any other relevant fact such…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. McDonald v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. BondurantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. SyrianiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. BaconSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API