Hill v. Villarreal
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McDÓNALD, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal, from an order dismissing plaintiffs’ suit, after plaintiffs refused to amend, following the sustaining of exceptions to plaintiffs’ pleadings.
This suit was instituted by Hill and others, against Villarreal and V. & L. Products Company, to permanently enjoin defendants from operating a rendering plant located within the city limits of San Antonio, and surrounded by closely settled residential districts of said town. The City of San Antonio intervened in the suit as a plaintiff.
Plaintiffs plead that defendants’ rendering plant as operated constituted a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Storey v. Central Hide & Rendering Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
- King v. Columbian Carbon Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- Lamb v. KinslowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Smith v. Western Hide & Fur Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- McKee v. City of Mt. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ellen v. City of BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Hill v. VillarrealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- McAfee MX D/B/A McAfee Moto Cross and Michael Mark McAfee v. Richard Foster, Phillip Fitzgerald, James and Sherri Estrada, Ray and Gabrielle Fletcher, Steve and Sandy Fairfield, Tim Hitchcock, and Haden Cowdry, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
- McAfee MX D/B/A McAfee Moto Cross and Michael Mark McAfee v. Richard Foster, Phillip Fitzgerald, James and Sherri Estrada, Ray and Gabrielle Fletcher, Steve and Sandy Fairfield, Tim Hitchcock, and Haden Cowdry, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008