Bennett v. Shinoda Floral, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
In these two consolidated cases, the plaintiffs brought actions for damages for personal injuries. In both cases, the trial courts granted defense motions for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiffs had executed releases of all claims.1 The issue we must decide is if the victims are bound, as a matter of law, by releases executed when they knew they had been injured, but did not know the extent or consequences of the injuries. The releases signed by both plaintiffs stated:
It is understood and agreed that this is a full and final release of all claims of every nature and kind…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Haller v. WallisWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Covich v. ChambersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Denton v. UtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Simonson v. FendellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Estate of Nelson v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Gossinger v. Association of Apartment Owners of the RegencyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Car Wash Enterprises, Inc. v. KampanosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Vanderpool v. Grange Insurance Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.