Cox v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtMatson, P. J.
(after stating the facts as above). It is first contended that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment. While there is a sharp conflict in the evidence, if the evidence introduced by the defendant and his witnesses was to receive credence by the jury to the exclusion of the state’s evidence, an acquittal should have resulted. On the other hand, the evidence as to the identification of the defendant by the prosecuting witness was positive, and supplemented as it was by the subsequent attempt of the defendant on the occasion of his arrest to escape and his explanation…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vickers v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- McDaniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Newby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
- Updike v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Broyles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- Hudson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1944
- Sprouse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
- Buchanan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.