Legal Opinion

Anthony Ussery, et al. v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 7, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00952Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY USSERY, et al., No. 2:23-cv-00952-DAD-SCR 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND 14 MERCEDES-BENZ USA LLC, MOTION FOR COSTS AND EXPENSES 15 Defendant. (Doc. No. 69) 16 17 18 This matter is before the court on the motion for attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses filed 19 by plaintiffs on March 26, 2025. (Doc. No. 69.) The court took this matter under submission 20 pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 75.) For the reasons explained below, the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Nadarajah v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API