Fort Cherry School District v. Gedman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
JOHNSON, J.:
¶ 1 John C. Gedman and Robin M. Ged-man (“the Gedmans”) appeal the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the Fort Cherry School District (“Fort Cherry”). In support of their appeal, the Gedmans argue that the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact existed and because the Gedmans wanted to engage in additional discovery so that they could prove a certain defense. We find that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Fort Cherry. Consequently, we affirm the trial court’s entry of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Harber Philadelphia Center City Office Ltd. v. LPCI Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- McCarthy v. Dan Lepore & Sons Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Jacques v. Akzo International Salt, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- ANTHONY BIDDLE CONTRACTORS, INC. v. Preet Allied American Street, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- George v. EllisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Burrell, B. v. Streamlight, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Arnoldy v. Forklift L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Burrell, B. v. Streamlight, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.