Henkleman v. Peterson
Appellate Court of Illinois
Memorandum.—In chancery. In the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Philip Stein, Judge, presiding. Bill to reform an injunction bond; dismissed for want of equity; appeal by complainants. Heard in this court at the March term, 1893, and affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court,
Waterman, J,
Appellants filed in the Superior Court their bill setting up, among other things, that in the Circuit Court, in a chancery cause therein pending wherein an interlocutory injunction had been granted, a bond theretofore given for the protection of the parties affected by the injunction having been found to be insufficient, it was ordered that a new bond in the penal sum of $5,000 be filed, to be approved by the clerk of the court. That thereupon said appellee, Peterson, in consideration thereof and of the continuance of the injunction, undertook to execute for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bernards Township v. StebbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Board of County Commissioners v. TowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Wadsworth v. WendellNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
- Inhabitants of Montville v. HaughtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
- Shaw v. . TobiasNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.