Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Wilmoth

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 1, 1933No. 15789PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the corporation court of the City of San Antonio for violating a city ordinance, and a fine of twenty-five dollars assessed. Under a capias pro fine he was taken into custody by the chief of police of the City of San Antonio. After a hearing on a writ of habeas corpus, the district court remanded him to custody. Hence this appeal.

The validity of an ordinance of the City of San Antonio is involved, appellant having been convicted of operating an automobile for hire without having first installed therein a. taximeter. The specific section appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LeslieCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Dockery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Ex Parte MaynardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Ex Parte BellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jester v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  2. McWilliams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  3. Williams v. WhittenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Ex parte TownsendCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Fogo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API