Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bell

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 23, 1893No. 248PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The nature and character of this proceeding is fully and sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMKINS, Judge.

Appellant was arrested, upon a charge of keeping a variety show, by the city marshal of the city of Houston, and at once sued out a writ of habeas corpus before the Hon. E. D. Cavin, judge of the Criminal District Court of Harris County, upon the ground, that the ordinance under which such arrest was made was void, because it was ultra vires, the city council having no power to declare acts innocent and legal in themselves to be criminal, and because the said ordinance is too indefinite and vague to be the basis of any action. Under the authority of Ex Parte Gregory, 20 Texas…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilmothCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Consumers Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Ex Parte J. BrewerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API