Robert D. Nelligan and Owen B. Nelligan, Jr., Partners Doing Business Under the Partnership Name of the Nelligans v. Ford Motor Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, District Judge.
This is another private antitrust action against Ford Motor Company in which a franchise dealer claims that the sales agreements and advertising agreements which he was forced to sign in order to retain his dealership violated both the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note, 12 et seq. In Miller Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 4 Cir., 252 F.2d 441, this court held that under the evidence in that case Ford’s requirement that the dealers contribute a certain amount per car to LMDA, a nonprofit corporation organized for Lincoln-Mercury dealer…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Radovich v. National Football LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Boston & Maine Corporation v. Town of HamptonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Dana I. Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Advance Business Systems & Supply Co. v. SCM CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
- Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- State v. Lawn King, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.