Estate of Bishop v. Bechtel Power Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiffs in a employee disability insurance dispute timely appealed the district court’s orders denying remand to state court and imposing sanctions against their attorney. We dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
I
On May 5, 1987, George and Pearl Bishop filed an action in California state court against Mr. Bishop’s former employer, ap-pellee Bechtel Power Corporation (“Bechtel”) and Bechtel’s carrier of long term employee disability insurance, appellee Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (“CIGNA”). The lawsuit (“Bishop /”) staked out nine…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Grubbs v. General Electric Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jerome R. Lewis v. Time IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Concha v. LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Cabrera v. City of Huntington ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Fidelitad, Inc. v. Insitu, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Canada Life Assurance Co. v. LaPeterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Rohm & Hass Texas, Inc. v. Ortiz Brothers Insulation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.