Legal Opinion

Cartier v. Douville

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Manistee. (Judkins, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This suit was brought to recover $2,500, being the amount paid by plaintiff to defendant as the purchase price of certain pine lands bought of the defendant, and for which he gave, and plaintiff received, a quitclaim deed. The declaration contained the common counts, and a special count, in which it was alleged that the defend-, ant assured the plaintiff that he had title to and owned said land, and ju'omised that he would convey to the plaintiff a good and sufficient title thereto. It avers that he relied upon such assurances and promises in making the purchase; that defendant had no title…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Frost v. AtwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Putnam v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Curtley v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Alsterberg v. BennettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Pierson v. BillSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. Kesler v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API