Cartier v. Douville
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Manistee. (Judkins, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This suit was brought to recover $2,500, being the amount paid by plaintiff to defendant as the purchase price of certain pine lands bought of the defendant, and for which he gave, and plaintiff received, a quitclaim deed. The declaration contained the common counts, and a special count, in which it was alleged that the defend-, ant assured the plaintiff that he had title to and owned said land, and ju'omised that he would convey to the plaintiff a good and sufficient title thereto. It avers that he relied upon such assurances and promises in making the purchase; that defendant had no title…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holcomb v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Frost v. AtwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Putnam v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Curtley v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Alsterberg v. BennettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Pierson v. BillSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Kesler v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900