Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1966No. 8PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The plea of not guilty by reason of temporary insanity is not a judicial admission that the defendant committed any unlawful act. Under a plea of not guilty the State must prove all elements of the offense charged. State v. Cephus, 239 N.C. 521, 80 S.E. 2d 147; State v. Harris, 223 N.C. 697, 28 S.E. 2d 232; State v. DeGraffenreid, 223 N.C. 461, 27 S.E. 2d 130.

After the State’s witness Jones had described the defendant’s acts and conduct immediately before he arose from the couch with the gun, he should have been permitted to say whether the defendant acted like a man not in his right mind.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. . DegraffenreidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. CephusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. Charles Phillips BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. RameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API