Legal Opinion

Reinke v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1963No. 4144PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIREY, Justice.

Plaintiff’s cause of action is one for damages to himself and his automobile growing out of a rear end collision. Pertinent to this discussion the jury found substantially that Charles Thomas, the driver, failed to keep a proper lookout for plaintiff’s car, and that such failure was a proximate cause of the collision; that C. L. Thomas entrusted his car to Charles Thomas, and this was the proximate cause of the collision; that plaintiff received personal injuries to his body and awarded plaintiff damages in the sum of $392.00 for necessary medical services, and further found in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hood v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Dallas Railway & Terminal Company v. GossettTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Smith v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Royal v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Knight v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Johnson v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Hebert v. Pan American Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Teague v. RoperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API