Legal Opinion

Nye v. Burlington & Lamoille R. R.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 15, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

MotioN to dismiss a writ on the ground that the service was illegal. Heard December Term, 1886, Veazey, J., presiding. Motion overruled. Affirmed. The substance of the motion was that the writ had not been legally served. It appeared from the officer’s return that he attached one car, and that he lodged a copy of the writ in the town clerk’s office, where the car was attached, and that he also left a copy with the clerk of the defendant company.

Read the full summary

MotioN to dismiss a writ on the ground that the service was illegal. Heard December Term, 1886, Veazey, J., presiding. Motion overruled. Affirmed. The substance of the motion was that the writ had not been legally served. It appeared from the officer’s return that he attached one car, and that he lodged a copy of the writ in the town clerk’s office, where the car was attached, and that he also left a copy with the clerk of the defendant company. The defendant in the mandatory part of the writ is described as 4 4 the Burlington and Lamoille Railroad Company, a company,” etc.; and there is…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Ross, J.

Conceding, without deciding, that the objection is available on motion, instead of plea, we do not think it is well taken. The defendant, as alleged in the writ, is the “Burlington and Lamoille Railroad Company, a company organized under the laws of this State.” The name of the defendant, “ Burlington and Lamoille Railroad Company,” as *587well as the qualifying clause, “a company organized under the laws of this State,” is consistent with the defendant being a corporation upon which service of process can be legally completed only by delivering a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rush v. Foos Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Burlington Grocery Co. v. Heaphy's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  3. In re ByronSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  4. Thibault v. Connecticut Valley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1907
  5. Peck v. LegranadeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API