Read v. Mackay
New York Supreme Court
Motion for an injunction to restrain the defendants’ use of the name of a banking and brokerage firm.
1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.
It is to be regretted that the near approach of the expiration of the copartnership of the parties to this action, by limitation, so urgently calls for an early decision of this motion, that the discussion of the important and interesting questions involved at deserving length is prevented, save at the expense of serious delay to many other matters now awaiting the court’s attention. The parties to this action are copartners, doing business as bankers and brokers, under the firm name of Vermilye & Co., and the plaintiff seeks to restrain the defendants’ use of the name after the 31st day of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Glen & Hall Manufacturing Co. v. HallCommission of Appeals · 1874
- Slater v. . SlaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Williams v. FarrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Prince Manufacturing Co. v. Prince's Metallic Paint Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Cassidy v. . UhlmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of LathamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Macfadden v. JenkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- Masters v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Coffey v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1936
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.