Legal Opinion

Atwood v. Berry

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 4, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

The motion to dismiss the amended petition was properly denied. In substance and effect the petition was a new and distinct proceeding. It sought relief against new parties and of a different character from that for which the original petition was brought. But the informality of procedure is not prejudicial to any of the defendants if the prosecution of the amended petition is carried on in disassociation from the original one. Willoughby v. Holderness, 62 N. H. 661; State v. Collins, 68 N. H. 46; Remick v. Company, 82 N. H. 182, 184, and cases cited.

The exception to the decree is sustained.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. CorronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
  2. Sweeney v. YoungSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  3. Holland v. Morley Button Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  4. Lewis v. HinesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
  5. State Ex Rel. Thorndike v. CollinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MacLay v. FullerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950
  2. Wheeler v. GrimesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API