Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Johnson v. Rundle

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 3, 1968No. 17234PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Appellant brought his petition for habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, alleging that his conviction 1 on charges of rape and robbery in the Pennsylvania state courts was constitutionally defective, in that evidence obtained as a result of an illegal arrest was used against him; certain admissions elicited by the police were introduced at trial, despite the fact that they had been made without appellant’s being advised of his constitutional rights; and there was such a lack of evidence on which to support a conviction…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States ex rel. Johnson v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Justus v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. United States Ex Rel. Senk v. BrierleyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. United States ex rel. Gockley v. MyersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. United States ex rel. Saunders v. ZieglerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. United States ex rel. Young v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API