State v. . Wade
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from J)miéis, J., at January Term, 1914, of LENOIR.
1Opinion of the Court
■Walker, J.
Tbe defendants, E. W. Wade and Pearlie Wade, were indicted for fornication and adultery, and from tbe judgment upon a verdict of guilty as to tbe male defendant be appealed to tbis Court. There were circumstances from wbicb tbe jury might have inferred bis guilt, and evidence of tbis kind is sufficient to support a conviction. S. v. Poteet, 30 N. C., 23; S. v. Eliason, 91 N. C., 564; S. v. Rinehart, 106 N. C., 787. Tbe judge permitted tbe State to prove that defendant bad separated from bis wife and failed to support her and her children, who were begotten by him, for ten or twelve…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- S. v. . BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Jeffress v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Hussey v. . KirkmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. . HerronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- State v. . JessupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- State v. . HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. . BiggerstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.