Legal Opinion
Pezold, Richey, Caruso & Barker v. Cherokee Nation Industries, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 26, 2001No. 93,856PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
CAROL M. HANSEN, Chief Judge:
T1 Defendant/Appellant, Cherokee Nation Industries, Inc. (CNT), seeks review of the trial court's order granting judgment against it in an attorney fee dispute with its former attorneys. We affirm because the trial court's order is not against the weight of the evidence or contrary to law.
T2 Plaintiff/Appellee, Pezold, Richey, Caruso, & Barker (Firm), is a law firm in Tulsa. CNI hired Firm in January 1996 to represent it in a contract dispute with Stewart & Stevenson Industries, Inc. (S & S). S & S had a contract with the United States Army to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Abel v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Howard v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Snow v. WinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. New Life Pentecostal Church of JenksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McQueen, Rains & Tresch, LLP v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- McQueen, Rains & Tresch, LLP v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008