Legal Opinion

Highland Trust Co. v. Slotnick

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 5, 1935PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.

The plaintiff, by trustee writ, brought an action in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston against the defendant Slotnick in which various tenants of Slotnick were summoned as trustees. After a hearing on the motion of the plaintiff to charge William Endicott Clapp, one of the trustees summoned under the writ, on his answer, the trial judge found that he was chargeable. The action was ripe for judgment against the principal defendant and, all parties having agreed that the liability of the other trustees should be determined in accordance with the decision of the court with respect to the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wood v. PartridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Fillebrown v. HoarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. International Paper Co. v. Priscilla Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Caruso v. ShelitMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Dexter v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jordan v. LavinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. HRPT Advisors, Inc. v. MacDonald, Levine, Jenkins & Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. Moskow v. FineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Rainault v. EvartsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Hustead v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API