Legal Opinion
Armand Santoro v. Accenture Federal Services, LL
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 5, 2014No. 12-2561PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge SHEDD wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge KEENAN joined.
SHEDD, Circuit Judge:
Dr. Armand Santoro appeals the district court’s order granting the motion by Accenture Federal Services, LLC (Accenture) to compel arbitration. Because we agree with the district court that the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank) does not invalidate the arbitration agreement between Accenture and Santo-ro, we affirm.
I
Santoro began his employment with Accenture in 1997 as a senior manager. From 1998 until 2007, Santoro…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, A/S/O Mirsan, L.P., D/B/A Sienna Ridge Apartments v. Carmen A. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Jacqueline Galloway v. Santander Consumer USA, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- James Hayes v. Delbert Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Mohammad Jahir v. Ryman Hospitality PropertiesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Boris Khazin v. TD Ameritrade Holding CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.