Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment Recordings, LLC
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BERTELSMAN, Senior District Judge:
This case raises important issues concerning the interpretation of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), 47 U.S.C. § 230. The case is before the Court on defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law. (Doc. 64). The Court heard oral argument on that motion on December 9, 2011. The Court now issues the following Opinion and Order.
This is a defamation and invasion-of-privacy action1 against the defendants Hooman Karamian a/k/a Nik Richie or Nik Lamas-Richie, the operator of a web site named “the dirty.com” and the corporations through…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fair Housing Coun., San Fernando v. Roommates. ComCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- McCall v. Courier-Journal & Louisville Times Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1981
- Federal Trade Commission v. Accusearch Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- E. W. Scripps Co. v. CholmondelayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment Recordings LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment Recordings, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013
- J.S. v. Vill. Voice Media Holdings, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- J.S. v. Vill. Voice Media Holdings, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- J.S. v. Village Voice Media Holdings, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.