Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Sovran Bank

Salem County Circuit Court

Decided April 20, 1989No. Case No. CH88000134Published

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE KENNETH E. TRABUE

I have reviewed the pleadings and memorandum of authority submitted by counsel for the parties, and I find that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment should be granted.

The trust is not challenged as invalid. The trust was revocable; the transfer of assets to the trustee was revocable; the trust by its own terms recognized the wife’s right to renounce and receive her widow rights; and I hold that the trust is a testamentary disposition of property and is subject to the claims of plaintiff’s widow’s rights.

I think that the rule of law is clearly announced in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lightfoot's Executors v. ColginSupreme Court of Virginia · 1816
  2. Bickers v. Shenandoah Valley National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  3. Freed v. Judith Realty & Farm Products Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API