Legal Opinion
Shipley v. Dugan
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided January 19, 1995No. IP89-1126-C-T/GPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Entry Regarding Defendants’ Motions for , Summary Judgment
TINDER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court upon the motions of Defendants Susan Forster Dugan (“Dugan”), Chris D. Monroe (“Monroe”) and Norman D. Curry (“Curry”) (collectively “the Judges”) and Defendant Randy Allman (“Allman”) for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court, having considered the motions, affidavits and supporting and opposing briefs, finds that Defendant Judges’ motion for summary judgment should be DENIED and Defendant Allman’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Webb v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Powell v. Town of SharpsburgDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Keaton v. Cobb CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
- Latimore v. Citibank, F.S.B.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Webb v. Government for District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.