Legal Opinion

Schenck v. Ballou

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Barlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vickers

This is an appeal from a decree of the superior court of Cook county dismissing, for want of equity, a bill filed to enforce the specific performance of a contract for the exchange of a flat-building in the city of Chicago-for a farm located in the State of Michigan. The bill was filed by John E. Schenck against W. P. and J. D. Ballou to enforce a written contract entered into December 23, 1910. By the terms of the contract Schenck agreed to convey to W. P. Ballou a flat-building in Chicago, subject to an encumbrance of $27,500, due on or before two years, for the Michigan farm, containing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowman v. CunninghamIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Beach v. DyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Wall v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1831

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ellis v. TreatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  2. Wisherd v. BollingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Huff v. FulkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  4. Public Savings Insurance Co. of America v. CoombesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Trimble v. HartSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API