Rogan v. Conterno
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
A tax was assessed against' defendant-appellee by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in April, 1940, on wine destroyed by fire in a bonded winery during 1939. The tax was paid under protest and suit was instituted against Nat Rogan, the local Collector of Internal Revenue, for refund. Judgment went for plaintiff and the collector appeals.
The action went to trial upon the first amended complaint and answer thereto, before the court sitting without a jury under appropriate stipulation. The complaint contains two alleged causes of action. The first cause is cast upon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Indian Motocycle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Cornell v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Graves v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bercut-Vandervoort & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Bercut-Vandervoort & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Bercut-Vandervoort & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958