Legal Opinion

Vigola v. Labor Exchange Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1937No. 33,360PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is a workmen’s compensation case. At the hearing before the compensation commissioner it was stipulated that *890the relation of employer and employee existed; that the parties are governed by the act; that claimant sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment; that notice of the injury was given and written demand for compensation made, as required by law; that the average weekly wage was $16.70, and thaf compensation in the sum of $80.16 had been paid. The question left at issue was the nature and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norman v. Consolidated Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Cruse v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Resnar v. Wilbert & Schreeb Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Woods v. Jacob Dold Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. Leamos v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Souden v. Rine Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  2. Fisher v. Rhoades Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Briney v. Hopper Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API