Legal Opinion

State v. Panetti

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided April 5, 1995No. 04-93-00443-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEEPLES, Justice.

Charged with capital murder, Scott Louis Panetti moved to suppress statements he had made to Texas Rangers during questioning. The trial court conducted a hearing and granted his motions to suppress. The State appealed, and this court affirmed the suppression order based on Russell v. State, 727 S.W.2d 573 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 856, 108 S.Ct. 164, 98 L.Ed.2d 119 (1987). In an unpublished opinion, we held that Panetti made an equivocal request for counsel, and the interrogating officer did not sufficiently narrow his response to clarifying the request. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. OwenSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  3. Robert Taylor Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  4. Michael Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  5. Michael Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API