Dan Rice Construction Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
This opinion addresses defendant’s motion filed March 19, 1996 for summary judgment. For reasons stated below, we conclude that genuine issues of material fact remain regarding the issues covered in defendant’s motion and, consequently, that defendant’s motion must be denied.
I
In June 1992, plaintiff entered into a construction contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for the replacement of a Payload Spin Test Facility and for construction of additions to the Hazardous Operation Support Facility at Kennedy Space Center, Florida. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dolmatch Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Magnus Pacific Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017