Legal Opinion

People v. D'Avolio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Where, as here, the sentencing court determines that it cannot adhere to its sentencing promise indicated prior to the acceptance of the plea, the proper procedure is to afford defendant the option of either withdrawing his plea or accepting an appropriate sentence (see, People v Selikoff', 35 NY2d 227, 238-239, cert denied 419 US 1122; People v Parry, 150 AD2d 809, 810, lv denied 74 NY2d 816; People v Pittman, 129 AD2d 592, lv denied 70 NY2d 716; People v Grant, 99 AD2d 536; People v Mack, 84 AD2d 540). Generally, " '[a] defendant who has not * *…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SelikoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. McConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. SchultzNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. People v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. People v. MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API