Legal Opinion
People v. Schultz
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 29, 1988PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*758OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
In these cases defendants pled guilty based upon a representation by the County Court Judge that a specific sentence would likely be imposed. When defendants appeared for sentencing, however, the County Court Judge indicated that, upon further consideration of the nature of the crime, he could not honor his earlier sentence offer, and that, instead, a lengthier sentence was appropriate. Defendants were then accorded the opportunity to withdraw their pleas, and were granted more than a week’s adjournment so…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. FarrarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. McConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. Danny G.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by73 opinions
- Donovan Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, and Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Kurz v. Justices of the Supreme CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. DonnellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. SierraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. MuhammadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.