Legal Opinion
Miller v. Farmers State Bank of Arco
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 24, 1925No. 24,879PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover upon a check drawn by one Howe in favor of the plaintiff upon the defendant hank. The basis of the action is an acceptance of the check through the failure of the defendant to return it within the time fixed by) the statute. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
On October 15, 1920, one Howe, then president of the defendant bank, mailed from Tyler to the plaintiff at South St. Paul his check on the defendant bank for §3,400. It was received by the plaintiff on October 17 or 18…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Wisner v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- State Bank v. Mutual Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- First National Bank of Murfreesboro v. First National Bank of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Commercial State Bank of Fort Worth v. Harkrider-Keith-Cooke Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mt. Vernon National Bank v. Canby State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- First State Bank v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- General Finance Corporation of Florida v. Central Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Hirleman v. NickelsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Clark v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.