Legal Opinion

In re Chasin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 1, 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Herman Chasin was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York by the *367Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department, on March 29,1961.

On January 23, 1992, respondent was served with charges alleging that he had violated Code of Professional Responsibility DR 6-101 (A) (3) (22 NYCRR 1200.30 [a] [3]) by neglecting three personal injury cases for extensive periods of time. Respondent, appearing pro se, submitted an answer that neither admitted nor denied the charges but simply offered a status report on the…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re FormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. In re KovitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. In re GruderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. In re RichmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. In re LampertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re DanasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re TeschnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re KleefieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. In re RosenkrantzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. In re HershbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API