In re Kovitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice in the First Judicial Department on June 27, 1951, and has at all relevant times maintained an office for the practice of law in the First *286Judicial Department. He is charged by petitioner, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee, with having neglected a legal matter entrusted to him in violation of Code of Professional Responsibility DR 6-101 (A) (3). Petitioner moves to confirm the findings of the Hearing Panel, which held respondent guilty as charged and recommended his suspension for a period of one year.
Respondent was retained in or…
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re RabinowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re LeavittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re ArandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re BerkmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.