Legal Opinion
William Conrad v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 25, 2016No. 15-1035PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge DAVIS wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge FLOYD joined.
DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge:
Appellee CSX Transportation, Inc. charged one of its employees, Appellant William M. Conrad, with “serious” violations of the company’s safety policy. Alleging he was disciplined in retaliation for his activities as local chairman of the transportation union, Conrad sued in federal district court under the Federal Railroad Safety Act (“FRSA”), 49 U.S.C. § 20109. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of CSX, concluding that Conrad had…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Thomas Kuduk v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Rebecca Groves v. Communication Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
3Cited by32 opinions
- Lincoln v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Nifong v. SOC, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
- Wooten v. BNSF Ry. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2019
- Jefferies v. UNC Regional Physicians PediatricsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Lockhart v. Long Island RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.