Legal Opinion

Egnal v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1989No. 2857 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KALISH, Senior Judge.

Michael Egnal (petitioner) appeals for review of an order and adjudication of the Insurance Commissioner, affirming the decision of the Valley Forge Insurance Company (Insurer) not to renew the insurance policy of petitioner. We affirm.

The Insurer notified petitioner of its refusal to renew petitioner’s automobile insurance policy. This refusal was affirmed by the Insurance Department. Petitioner appealed to the Insurance Commissioner. As a result of a hearing attended by petitioner and a representative of the Insurer, the Insurance Commissioner made the following…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Appeal of TabasCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Perry v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kramer v. Department of InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API