Legal Opinion

Teneyck v. Roller Hockey Colorado, Ltd.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 2000No. 99CA1215PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge STERNBERG. *

Plaintiff, Gary N. Teneycek, appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of defendants, Roller Hockey Colorado, Ltd., and Roller Hockey of Colorado GP, Inc. We reverse and remand with directions.

While attending a roller hockey game, plaintiff was seriously injured when he was struck by a puck that left the playing surface and flew into the spectator seating area. He subsequently initiated this action, and defendants moved for summary judgment, contending, inter alia, that the common law "no duty" rule precluded recovery for injuries suffered by spectators at…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Jones v. Three Rivers Management Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Ingersoll v. Onondaga Hockey Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Bayer v. Crested Butte Mountain Resort, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. Bittle v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Petrongola v. Comcast-Spectacor, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Laughman v. GirtakovskisColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Larrieu v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  5. Reid v. BerkowitzColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API