Legal Opinion

Droesch Homes, Inc. v. Pietros

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO. A. Johnson, J.

In an action for the specific performance of an agreement in writing affecting real estate situated in the county of Nassau, the defendants move (1) pursuant to subdivision 8 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that the written instrument upon which the action is predicated is unenforcible under the provisions of the Statute of Frauds [Real Property Law, § 259] and (2) pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike out paragraphs “ 7 ”, “ 8 ” and “ 9 ” of *716said amended complaint on the ground that the allegations, thereof are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Gillet v. . Bank of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Kenyon v. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Simon v. . EtgenNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Piedmont Hotel Co. v. A. E. Nettleton Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steen v. RustadMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Steen v. RustadMontana Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API