Legal Opinion

Smith v. Atlas-Pocahontas Coal Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, McDowell County. Action by G-. S. Smith against the Atlas Pocahontas Coal Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, President:

The declaration contains the common counts and a special count in assumpsit, alleging in the special count the yerbal contract sued on substantially as follows: That in consideration of the promise and agreement of plaintiff with defendant that he would do the necessary grading for a road bed for a tram or haul-wa.y from the openings or outside entries to be made by plaintiff to the m'ain haul-way of defendant, oyer, which to haul the coal, and would dig and mine all the coal in a certain seam or vein under what was known as the “Spur,” near Antler, McDowell county, below…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Delmar Oil Co. v. BartlettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Bannister v. Victoria Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Barrett v. Raleigh Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Douglass v. Railroad Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Jones v. Singer Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Franklin v. PenceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Ross v. Lake & Export Coal Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Belcher v. King and ParrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Dale v. AtwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Polino v. KeckWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API