Legal Opinion

State v. English

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Cole Circuit Court. — Hon. George W. Miller, . ■ Judge. There was no error in permitting the witness to state the whereabouts of Moore.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Cole Circuit Court. — Hon. George W. Miller, . ■ Judge. There was no error in permitting the witness to state the whereabouts of Moore. He was indicted as principal, and the defendant as being present, aiding, abetting and assisting him; the evidence clearly .shows that Moore committed the larceny; that he aind- defendant were seen to leave California together, i-iding horses belonging t.o defendant, and were seen in the neighborhood of the house where the larceny was committed, and were seen together in the evening of that day in California, and on this' evidence the inquiry that…

1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.

At the May term, 1876, of the circuit court of Cole county, the defendant was indicted jointly with one Mack Moore, for grand larceny, and for receiving stolen property, knowing the same to have been stolen.

The first count of the indictment charged that Moore “ did feloniously steal, take and carry away thirty-five dollars, one note, one twenty dollar bj.ll, one ten dollar and one five dollar bill, lawfxxl money of the United States, of the-value of thirty-five dollar’s, then and thex’e the px’opex'ty of John Peter Si-nish,” and the defendant was px’esent aiding, abetting, assisting and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. FaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1877

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. KennedySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. State v. TatmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  3. Branch v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. State v. HayesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. State v. OwenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API