Legal Opinion
Bell v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 30, 2001No. 01-3863PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Marvin Bell, an Ohio prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Bell filed a complaint against the Ohio Adult Parole Authority (“OAPA”); Gloria Andrews-Jones and Constance Upper, members of the Ohio Parole Board; and Harold K. Miller, a parole board hearing officer. Bell alleged that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Butterfield v. BailCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Schafer v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Littles v. Board of Pardons & Paroles DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bell v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hall v. Chambers SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Rucker v. PurvianceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022