Legal Opinion
Corn v. Shelton Equipment & Machine Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided October 19, 1966No. 66-348 CivilPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Defendant’s Motion to Quash the process served upon it herein and Motion to Dismiss the suit for lack of jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, are both denied.
From the affidavits presented herein it appears that the defendant has delivered its products in Oklahoma and used its motor vehicles for such purpose, *956the said motor vehicles being operated under a permit from the Oklahoma Tax Commission; has had a salesman working in the State of Oklahoma and has repaired some of its defective products in Oklahoma. This would constitute the necessary “minimum…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- S. Howes Co. v. W. P. Milling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Duple Motor Bodies, Ltd. v. Clarence A. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Duple Motor Bodies, Ltd. v. Clarence A. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969