Legal Opinion
Putnam Sand & Gravel Co. v. Albers
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1971No. Civ. 1242PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GINSBURG, J. *
Plaintiff recovered a money judgment which was declared to be a lien against certain real property; he appeals from a portion of the judgment which made the lien subject to a claimed homestead exemption.
On August 10, 1967, the defendants Albers and others owed money to plaintiff on an account for building materials. On that date the de fendants Albers conveyed the real property in issue here to the Yorks, their daughter and son-in-law, without consideration. This conveyance was admittedly a fraudulent transfer under the provisions of section 3439.07 of the Civil Code.
On…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yager v. YagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Rich v. ErvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Lucci v. United Credit and Collection Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Swartfager v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Breeden v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
3Cited by16 opinions
- Amin v. KhazindarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Orville R. Goodwin v. United States of America Calvin E. Esselstrom Joseph PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Renda v. NevarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- In Re Lester D. Lane and Bonnie F. Lane, Debtors. Hurst Concrete Products, Inc. v. Lester D. Lane Bonnie F. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Stagen v. Stewart-West Coast Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.